Skip to main content

Standard 12 Reflection

Standard 12 for Seattle Pacific University's Teacher Leadership Standards states that teacher leaders "evaluate and use technology for teaching and learning".  The class EDTC 6433, Teaching with Technology, was a great learning tool to move forward in this standard.  Technology is something that has been a passion of mine since before becoming a teacher.  It seemed so natural to me to integrate technology into my classroom practices in order to get the most out of instructional times.  Where this class helped me the most, however, is thinking about leveraging technology for our entire school building, our communities, and in working with teachers who aren't as comfortable with technology. 

While I think the entire "Teaching with Technology" blog page demonstrates various aspects of this standard (linked here), I think both reflection #3 and reflection #5 highlight key understandings from the course related to the standard.  These two subjects, digital citizenship and lifelong learning through technology, are the foundation for teaching with technology and learning as an educator through it.  These reflections also hold many resources that demonstrate some of my learning. 

Since taking this class, I've continued my work both on myself and helping others through teaching with technology.  I remain our buildings technology team leader, facilitating adult meetings about the technology us in our building.  We are looking at ways that we can maximize our technology budget to reach all students in the building and also support teachers to integrate technology effectively in their classroom.  I am also excited to see how we can enhance our technology usage as we work on adopting our new STEM curriculum. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 8 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University’s Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 8 states that teacher leaders “ present professional practice for the review of colleagues .”  This standards summarized the entire experience of our teacher leadership program.  We have been given opportunities to reflect on our teaching through recording various teaching strategies and seek feedback from colleagues, practice coaching techniques, and also get feedback from various research, papers, and presentations around a specific educational topic.   At the beginning of the course, you can read about my initial reflection here .  This is where I engaged in self-reflection to identify the areas of focus I had for this program in regards to my district’s instructional framework, Danielson.  Since this course, I have had many opportunities to expand my knowledge in my self-selected area, Domain 3, along with all Danielson domains.   Survey of Instructional Strategies is the course...
Post a Comment
Read more

Communication & Collaboration- Initial Reflection

While each model of distributed leadership had clear differences, they all seemed to base their ideas on the premise that leadership can take place within a variety of contexts and are not limited to just one specific person or role.   This is also true of my experiences in a school setting.   I related most to Ogawa, Pounder, and colleagues' model of leadership as an organization-wide resource of power and influence.   There are various types of leadership within our building and my district, each which comes with its own set of power and influence.   While certainly administration holds a significant amount of power and often times influence as well, certain teachers in our building share and equal amount of influence, especially with other colleagues and with parents.   I also related to this model's criteria for effective organizations, particularly being able to control relationships within an environment and building a sense of commitment amongst sta...
Post a Comment
Read more

Standard 11 Reflection

Standard 11- Formative and Summative Assessment Standard 11 in Teacher Leadership standards for Seattle Pacific University states one must be able to “ utilize formative and summative assessment in a standards based environment .” As my skills in other teacher leadership standards have increased, this one naturally did as well.  While I used to shy away from the word “assessment” all together, I have realized that I cannot be a skilled and effective teacher without it.  I also realized how much I used formative assessments throughout my lessons without explicitly planning it. Throughout my experience in the Teacher Leadership program, my skills in both implementing specific formative assessment and choosing appropriate summative assessments have increased. At the very beginning of our program, we spent some time looking through our districts evaluation criteria, mine being the Danielson Framework.  We identified areas of strength and areas we want to ...
Post a Comment
Read more