Skip to main content

Standard 2

Standard Two of Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders "analyze learning to promote student growth".  While I believe this standard was woven throughout all of our courses in the teacher leadership program, I was able to demonstrate using the most through my action research project. 

Linked here is my action research reflection, that discusses what I did for my research project and why I selected that action research topic.  It also includes some sample student work in which I analyzed to move forward with student growth.  The part of my action research project that I feel highlights the analyzing of student learning the most was the data collection process.  Linked is an outline that I used for my action research project.  This holds the information of how much dialogue was able to take place using accountable talk sentence stems by my first graders with and without my interjecting.  This, along with the resources provided within the action research reflection with using digital portfolios, shows how I analyzes student learning to promote student growth. 

Today, I still find myself tracking how often my students are able to carry on an academic conversation using sentence stems with each other.  I realized from analyzing my student's growth in this area that the more independent my students are with explaining their thinking, they are much quicker to grasp a concept, especially when using powerful tools such as accountable talk (Michaels, 2013).  I have also worked more recently on incorporating goal setting in every subject and allowing my first graders to take ownership of their own goals in order to promote student growth.  This work can also be powerful, as students' mindsets shift as the focus shifts from my responsibility to theirs to learn something (Ferlazzo, 2017).


References:

Ferlazzo, L. (2017, January 23). Response: Students 'Take Ownership of Their Learning' Through Goal-Setting. Retrieved from https://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/classroom_qa_with_larry_ferlazzo/2017/01/students-take-ownership-of-their-learning-through-goal-setting.html

Michaels, S. (2013). Accountable Talk Sourcebook: For Classroom Conversation that Works. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 8 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University’s Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 8 states that teacher leaders “ present professional practice for the review of colleagues .”  This standards summarized the entire experience of our teacher leadership program.  We have been given opportunities to reflect on our teaching through recording various teaching strategies and seek feedback from colleagues, practice coaching techniques, and also get feedback from various research, papers, and presentations around a specific educational topic.   At the beginning of the course, you can read about my initial reflection here .  This is where I engaged in self-reflection to identify the areas of focus I had for this program in regards to my district’s instructional framework, Danielson.  Since this course, I have had many opportunities to expand my knowledge in my self-selected area, Domain 3, along with all Danielson domains.   Survey of Instructional Strategies is the course...

Communication & Collaboration- Initial Reflection

While each model of distributed leadership had clear differences, they all seemed to base their ideas on the premise that leadership can take place within a variety of contexts and are not limited to just one specific person or role.   This is also true of my experiences in a school setting.   I related most to Ogawa, Pounder, and colleagues' model of leadership as an organization-wide resource of power and influence.   There are various types of leadership within our building and my district, each which comes with its own set of power and influence.   While certainly administration holds a significant amount of power and often times influence as well, certain teachers in our building share and equal amount of influence, especially with other colleagues and with parents.   I also related to this model's criteria for effective organizations, particularly being able to control relationships within an environment and building a sense of commitment amongst sta...

Survey of Instructional Strategies- Reflection

Over the course of this quarter, my confidence in using and naming instructional strategies has drastically increased.   While I already had knowledge of many of these strategies under my belt prior to taking this course and used them frequently, I was not in a position to effectively teach them to others or even collect data on them within my own teaching.   One of the most powerful pieces to my learning in this course was being able to put a name to the strategies that I’ve previously found successful within my own teaching.   With now having the increased knowledge of names of instructional strategies, areas in lessons and units that they are most effective, and an ability to take data of them, I am able to have meaningful conversations with other educators.   I also have more tools for my teacher leader “toolkit” as far as guiding teachers to effective, research based strategies that help further student learning.   In addition to the deep dive in...