Skip to main content

EDU 6528 Initial Reflection

After looking at the instructional framework for your district, what area do you wish to improve on in terms of either content or pedagogy (i.e. teaching, lesson planning, specific instructional strategies, etc)?
More specifically, write a 3-5 paragraph self-assessment indicating:
  • Your area(domain) of strength,
  • Area (domain) you will focus your professional goals
  • Be sure to connect to your framework’s specific domain or equivalent area. If you teach in a private school, then choose one of the linked frameworks to work from.

Initial Reflection

After taking some time to review the Danielson Framework and consider my teaching practices regarding this framework, I believe my strength is currently in Domain 1: Planning and Preparation.  Organization and structure are very important to me, so I continuously work on making sure I am also organized within my teaching practices.  Designing instructional units and lesson planning is one of my greatest passions.  I love searching for new ideas and working with existing curriculum to make a cohesive and engaging unit.  I also enjoy working with student data and using it to set goals with my students and for myself.  I am a “big picture” kind of person, and I try to bring that strength into my teaching as well.  One example of this is creating a curriculum map for my team.  Before I joined the team, there was a packet of general things we could do each month, but it was not very specific and didn’t list specific weeks/times the units should be taught.  I took this information, blended it with our district’s curriculum “at a glance” information, and made a timeline curriculum map for our team.  We now are on the same page with a lot more lessons and can collaborate more effectively.  While I chose this area as a strength, I look forward to learning more about how I can work with others to help them learn to love this area of teaching as much as I do. 

One domain that I would like to focus on throughout the teacher leadership program is Domain 3: Instruction.  While I don’t necessarily feel as though I am struggling in this category, there is just so many components in this domain that teachers do daily.  It also is one of the domains that most directly effects students.  While I feel like I have a good grasp of what I should be doing regarding instructional techniques and communicating with students, it is hard for me to always follow through or choose the correct technique/interaction for the exact moment. I do try my best to plan for a variety of situations and students; however, so much of teaching is being flexible and changing your instructional strategies each lesson to meet the needs of your students.  I would like to work on knowing which technique in my “toolbox” to pull out and when. 

Another aspect of Domain 3 that I would like to focus on is differentiating within my instruction.  I feel as though my undergraduate experience did a great job for setting me up for what differentiation is and how it can be used within the classroom.  Right now, I do the basics within my classroom as far as differentiation like creating workshop style lessons for reading, writing, and math.  This helps me pull flexible and small groups so that I can meet the needs of my diverse learners.  One struggle that I run in to with differentiation is the work load that sometimes accompanies it.  When I really try to focus on differentiating a particular lesson or unit, I find that my workload doubles and it becomes hard to keep up with each week.  I’d love to gain some more insight into how to create concise and effective differentiated lessons that don’t require a lot of planning or prep work. 

While I chose Domain 1 as a strength and Domain 3 as an area to improve, I know that I have a lot of room to grow in all four domains.  I look forward to venturing into this program to strengthen each domain for myself and gain some skills to help others do the same.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 11 Reflection

Standard 11- Formative and Summative Assessment Standard 11 in Teacher Leadership standards for Seattle Pacific University states one must be able to “ utilize formative and summative assessment in a standards based environment .” As my skills in other teacher leadership standards have increased, this one naturally did as well.  While I used to shy away from the word “assessment” all together, I have realized that I cannot be a skilled and effective teacher without it.  I also realized how much I used formative assessments throughout my lessons without explicitly planning it. Throughout my experience in the Teacher Leadership program, my skills in both implementing specific formative assessment and choosing appropriate summative assessments have increased. At the very beginning of our program, we spent some time looking through our districts evaluation criteria, mine being the Danielson Framework.  We identified areas of strength and areas we want to work on throug
Post a Comment
Read more

Reflection on Teaching and Learning

Teacher Leadership Standard 3 The third Teacher Leadership standard states " Teacher leaders improve teaching and learning through the use of educational research a the classroom and school levels" ( Seattle Pacific University-Teacher Leadership Program Standards).  While various classes within SPU's teacher leadership program facilitated opportunities to improve teaching and learning practices, completing an action research project and sharing my findings with administration was a learning experience that best highlighted this standard.  Throughout my reflection you will notice that I was able to take charge of my own learning and growth within my classroom, and then share my findings with others.  Going through the practice of identifying areas of growth, doing my own educational research, and then implementing a plan of action within my classroom was an empowering experience as an educator and helped sharpen my skills as a teacher leader in order to facilitate actio
Post a Comment
Read more

Standard 1 Reflection

Standard 1 of Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders “model ethical and moral behavior”.  The class EDU 6085 was one class that focused specifically on this standard.   Below is a reflection from reading “The Charged Classroom” by Judith Pace that demonstrates my understanding related to this standard.    When considering “The Charged Classroom”, Judith Pace is primarily referring to the many challenges that both teachers and students face when encountering differences or potentially uncomfortable conversations within the classroom.  Many factors can contribute to a “charged” classroom, such as academic rigor and pressures that both teachers and students face, opportunities for discussion around conflicting viewpoints, or communicating academic standards and results.  While Pace highlights the many difficulties that can accompany a “charged” classroom, it is evident that such is unavoidable and can contribute towards a healt
Post a Comment
Read more