Skip to main content

End of Course Reflection


           Initially, my assumptions about this course were quite different than the learning that took place throughout the course and the understandings I have now.  When thinking of communication and collaboration, I knew it encompassed almost all aspects of working in the field of education; however, I didn’t realize the importance that adult learning theories had in engaging others in their own professional learning.  I started realizing a lot of the research behind the professional learning strategies that take place in my district and within my building, and I also have identified some areas of possible growth for my building and district based on my new understandings.
                Looking at our course objectives, we were to understand and apply adult learning theories for professional learning, demonstrate our knowledge about effective professional practices, analyze the context and needs of a school, and plan actions for appropriate collaboration within a school setting.  Initially, I knew what I preferred when being engaged in professional learning: the assumption that I was a competent educator, opportunities for creativity and space for individuality, and time for reflection.  It wasn’t until this course that many of what I look for in professional learning are consistent with the pillars of andragogy.  While I was extremely familiar with considering pedagogy in almost all aspects of my teaching, I really hadn’t taken the time to consider aspects of adult learning in the same way.  I now have the language and research to use when planning for adult professional learning, which will be key in ensuring that the learning is appropriate for all teachers. 
                The five assumptions of an adult learner is something that I will now use to gauge professional practices within my building and district.  Especially when considering one’s own independent self-concept, it is imperative that administration allows for individuality and assumes self-motivation in their educators.  It is also extremely important that the practical nature of the professional learning shines through and applications for immediate use are offered (Merriam, 2001). 
                Using this information and considering the need in my building, I was able to construct a professional learning plan for my building that will both help with our school improvement plan but will also engage teachers in collaboration and new learning.  My plan, linked here, uses the strategies mentioned above and research from Zepeda to construct a year long professional learning series focusing on increasing teacher use of technology to reach parents in the area of reading.  Considering that the professional learning needed to be centered around data and research (Zepeda, 2008), it consisted of many pre and post surveys as well as research around reading at home and engaging families through technology.  It also significantly focused on teacher leadership, using other teachers to engage the building in the learning process through modeling and allowing other teachers to observe.  I now feel that having a component of teacher leadership is vital to all professional learning, as it allows the planner to consider the state of continuum each teacher is in (Zepeda, 2008) and it draws out the best efforts in teachers. 
                When interviewing my principal, it was clear that there will always be challenges and issues raised with professional learning within a building.  It was enlightening to see, though, that many of the issues addressed can be reduced when considering each adult as an individual learner and providing a variety of opportunities for teachers to feel like their needs are individually met. I appreciate the new understanding that planning a professional learning series has given me, as I didn’t fully realize the work that goes into planning a building series previously.  I am excited to continue with the work that I started in this course, as my principal has asked that we work components of my professional learning plan into our current building professional development series. I am excited to see where this learning takes me next as we work with our building on this. 


Resources:
Graham, S. (n.d.). A Simple, Easy To Understand Guide To Andragogy. Retrieved from        https://www.cornerstone.edu/blogs/lifelong-learning-matters/post/a-simple-easy-to-understand-guide-to-andragogy
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of      Adult Learning Theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,2001(89), 3. doi:10.1002/ace.3

Zepeda, S. J. (2008). Professional development: What works. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 1 Reflection

Standard 1 of Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders “model ethical and moral behavior”.  The class EDU 6085 was one class that focused specifically on this standard.   Below is a reflection from reading “The Charged Classroom” by Judith Pace that demonstrates my understanding related to this standard.    When considering “The Charged Classroom”, Judith Pace is primarily referring to the many challenges that both teachers and students face when encountering differences or potentially uncomfortable conversations within the classroom.  Many factors can contribute to a “charged” classroom, such as academic rigor and pressures that both teachers and students face, opportunities for discussion around conflicting viewpoints, or communicating academic standards and results.  While Pace highlights the many difficulties that can accompany a “charged” classroom, it is evident that such is unavoidable and can c...

Standard 6 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 6 states that teacher leaders "communicate and collaborate with a variety of stakeholders".  Both within the classes "Communication and Collaboration" (EDU 6600) and in "Engaging Communities" (EDAD 6589) I realized the huge impact that partnering with involved parties can have on a school building.  Prior to my teacher leadership program work I felt as though I was very narrowed in on things that I felt directly related to my students and I: my student's families engagement with curriculum, communicating academics to parents, providing updates, etc.  It wasn't until I looked more broadly at the entire school community that I realize the more involved I am as a teacher and the more community outreach we do as a building, the more successful our students can be.   One artifact that demonstrates my learning process when engaging with communities is my Community Engagement ...

Standard 12 Reflection

Standard 12 for Seattle Pacific University's Teacher Leadership Standards states that teacher leaders "evaluate and use technology for teaching and learning".  The class EDTC 6433, Teaching with Technology, was a great learning tool to move forward in this standard.  Technology is something that has been a passion of mine since before becoming a teacher.  It seemed so natural to me to integrate technology into my classroom practices in order to get the most out of instructional times.  Where this class helped me the most, however, is thinking about leveraging technology for our entire school building, our communities, and in working with teachers who aren't as comfortable with technology.  While I think the entire "Teaching with Technology" blog page demonstrates various aspects of this standard ( linked here ), I think both reflection #3 and reflection #5 highlight key understandings from the course related to the standard.  These two subjects, digital...