Skip to main content

Standard 9

Standard 9

The Seattle Pacific University Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 9 states teacher leaders “evaluate and use effective curriculum design”.  Throughout my experiences both in my teaching position and through pieces of the courses I have taken in this program, I have had opportunities to practice evaluating and using effective curriculum design.  Within the course “survey of instructional strategies”, we were provided with many opportunities to practice and teach research based strategies that can then be used as guidelines within curriculum development and design.  Through my teaching position, I have also been given opportunities to sharpen my skills in this area such as designing a curriculum map for my team and being a part of a STEM curriculum adoption committee.

Prior to entering the teacher leadership program, I did feel competent in creating and evaluating effective curriculum design.  When I started my first teaching job in Washington State, I was actually shocked by the full curriculum already planned out and given to teachers in my district.  My teacher education program in Michigan focused heavily on creating our own effective, standards based curriculum, because many districts in the state did not have rich and full curriculums offered.  I think this is the best way to learn, because until you know how to design cohesive, standards based units and evaluate it using research based practices, how do you know pre-made curriculum is really effective?  
I used this as an opportunity to demonstrate something that I could bring to my team, even though I was a beginning teacher.  Many of our teachers felt overwhelmed by the amount of curriculum to get through in some areas, and then I noticed we were really lacking in current and updated curriculum in other areas.  I felt like part of the reason the team was overwhelmed was because they didn’t have a clear or cohesive curriculum map. (Linked here) you can see the curriculum map that was made for our team.  I felt it was important for us to have something we could hang up and visually see daily. It was important to me to have something where we could look at a unit and visually see how long it was going to take.  Without having a clear understanding of how much time we have in our units or what topics will be coming up next, the instruction we would deliver wouldn’t be the most effective it could be. Moving forward with this, I would like to continue my research to make our curriculum mapping more effective.  The ASCD article “curriculum mapping” states that while planning that “what” and the “when” is important, good curriculum mapping also includes the “how” (Burns, 2001). Before I take on the role of team leader next year, I plan on digging deeper into this and making a plan to both keep a simple curriculum map that can be posted and glanced at, but then also have it online and linkable to more detailed instructions.    
The “Survey of Instructional Strategies” course also helped with curriculum design because it allowed me to look for exceptional, research based strategies within curriculum already provided for us.  When you are fortunate to have an abundance of curriculum provided to you, you often have to pick and choose lessons due to time constraints. This course gave me a better understanding of what good instructional strategies looked like such as opportunities of collaborative learning, nonlinguistic representations, communication of learning targets, effective reading strategies, and research based graphic organizers (Hyginus et.al., 2018).  It also helped with knowing what strategies would be best to use with specific types of lessons. Gaining this knowledge, I was able to weed out ineffective lessons given to us in curriculum. I was also able to enhance units that didn’t have as many effective strategies embedded in them. (Here) is an example of a lesson from a science unit that was outdated and didn’t have effective strategies within the lessons. I was able to use what I learned from the instructional strategies course to change it while still teaching the same content.  
The final experience that has increased my knowledge of evaluating effective curriculum is being a member of our districts STEM adoption committee.  Here, I was able dig into state standards, pulling them apart and identifying “look fors” in curriculum. I learned even more the importance of aligning our philosophy and teaching practice beliefs with current state adopted standards.  We used this to allow alignment to be a priority in our future decision making, something that is recommended widely when discussing a new curriculum adoption (edreports) I was able to also evaluate various science curriculums to look for effective, research based pedagogy and provide feedback and suggestions on each.  I look forward to my future experiences with this committee as we move onto engaging staff members in our final selections, further evaluation by piloting resources and comparing them to best practice, and training teachers in new implementation of a curriculum.



References:
3 Resources for Successful Curriculum Adoption. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Burns, R. C. (n.d.). Curriculum Mapping. Retrieved from              p://www.ascd.org/publications/curriculum-handbook/421/chapters/Overview.aspx
Hyginus, Arun, Brittani, Imran, S., Hamood, Hamood, & Fekara. (2018, February 28). 7 Effective
Teaching Strategies For The Classroom. Retrieved from
https://www.quizalize.com/blog/2018/02/23/teaching-strategies/

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 11 Reflection

Standard 11- Formative and Summative Assessment Standard 11 in Teacher Leadership standards for Seattle Pacific University states one must be able to “ utilize formative and summative assessment in a standards based environment .” As my skills in other teacher leadership standards have increased, this one naturally did as well.  While I used to shy away from the word “assessment” all together, I have realized that I cannot be a skilled and effective teacher without it.  I also realized how much I used formative assessments throughout my lessons without explicitly planning it. Throughout my experience in the Teacher Leadership program, my skills in both implementing specific formative assessment and choosing appropriate summative assessments have increased. At the very beginning of our program, we spent some time looking through our districts evaluation criteria, mine being the Danielson Framework.  We identified areas of strength and areas we want to work on throug
Post a Comment
Read more

Reflection on Teaching and Learning

Teacher Leadership Standard 3 The third Teacher Leadership standard states " Teacher leaders improve teaching and learning through the use of educational research a the classroom and school levels" ( Seattle Pacific University-Teacher Leadership Program Standards).  While various classes within SPU's teacher leadership program facilitated opportunities to improve teaching and learning practices, completing an action research project and sharing my findings with administration was a learning experience that best highlighted this standard.  Throughout my reflection you will notice that I was able to take charge of my own learning and growth within my classroom, and then share my findings with others.  Going through the practice of identifying areas of growth, doing my own educational research, and then implementing a plan of action within my classroom was an empowering experience as an educator and helped sharpen my skills as a teacher leader in order to facilitate actio
Post a Comment
Read more

EDTC 6433 Module 3 Reflection

Modeling Digital Citizenship to Young Learners The question I set out to answer for Module 3 was “How can I model effective use of technology to encourage students to be digital citizens?”.  I chose this question based off of the ISTE Standard 3: Model Digital Age Work and Learning.  I wanted to focus primarily on the “modeling” aspect of this ISTE standard, because it is so important that effective use of technology is modeled to students from an early age.  Since I teach first grade, I model everything I do.  It only makes sense to model effective use of technology right along with my students, even when I am not specifically teaching a lesson related to technology.  If I am modeling the correct ways to use technology, my students are more likely to use it the correct way as well when they get an opportunity to use it.  When reviewing the Module 3 assigned readings, I came across the article “The Difference between Digital Literacy and Digital Fluency”.  This article expre
2 comments
Read more