Skip to main content

EDU 6979 Multiplier Initial Reflection

I enjoyed reading the first chapter of The Multiplier Effect and am excited to continue reading!  Many of us as educators have always known that micromanaging is not the most effective way lead people, but it was encouraging to see that there is evidence that the opposite tactics can produce even more productivity.  When reviewing the five disciplines of the multiplier, I was able to make connections to people that are around me in education.  It was interesting to identify certain people in my professional circle was "multipliers" or "accidental diminishers". 

While reading the accidental diminishers section in this chapter, I found myself thinking "Why would any leader with good intentions do these things?!".  As I took the accidental diminisher quiz, however, I quickly realized that it is not so black and white.  Many aspects that some would view as great foundations of leadership can often come off as diminishing, even though not intended so.  I certainly found some areas to work on for my (type A) self. 

I was initially surprised to find that I scored a 23, which puts me in the "likely an accidental diminisher: category.  From reading the responses afterwards, here are some things I'll need to work on to lower that number:

  • I am a "big thinker" and like propose long-term ideas to others.  While in the past this has been successful for me in my professional life, I realized that it only helped me when I was not in a leadership position.  I likely had bosses that were multipliers, which allowed me to project those ideas.  I may need to do some work on this as my roles change in education throughout the years.  While I don't think it is always a bag thing to "dream big" and have some good long-term goals, I'll need to make sure to keep an open mind and leave space for others' dreams to unfold within mine.  
  • I react quickly when problems arise.  To me, this was a no brainier that of course, as an educator, I need to react quickly.  Teachers make SO many decisions in a day.  If I took my time with each and every one of them, neither my students or myself would be getting anywhere.  From a leadership perspective, however, (and I know at times as a teacher as well) I'll need to react differently so that more voices can be heard and the best decision can be made.  
  • The third aspect that made me an accidental diminisher, and likely the thing that I am still struggling with even after reading the chapter, is my work ethic.  I continue to hold the understanding that if I deliver high-quality work, it sets a good example for others.  The issue that I am grappling with is the "high-quality work" part.  What educator SHOULDN'T be providing high-quality work?  I think the part that the authors are focusing on, however, is the "pace-setting" portion.  I try my best to work efficiently and in a timely manner in addition to working hard, but my pace may not be the same as the pace of those around me, and that is okay.  I'll need to work on realizing that if my pace is too fast for those around me, I could actually be making them even more unproductive.  
I enjoy continuing to read this book both with the lens of a teacher being led, and as a leader in my building.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 1 Reflection

Standard 1 of Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders “model ethical and moral behavior”.  The class EDU 6085 was one class that focused specifically on this standard.   Below is a reflection from reading “The Charged Classroom” by Judith Pace that demonstrates my understanding related to this standard.    When considering “The Charged Classroom”, Judith Pace is primarily referring to the many challenges that both teachers and students face when encountering differences or potentially uncomfortable conversations within the classroom.  Many factors can contribute to a “charged” classroom, such as academic rigor and pressures that both teachers and students face, opportunities for discussion around conflicting viewpoints, or communicating academic standards and results.  While Pace highlights the many difficulties that can accompany a “charged” classroom, it is evident that such is unavoidable and can c...

Standard 6 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 6 states that teacher leaders "communicate and collaborate with a variety of stakeholders".  Both within the classes "Communication and Collaboration" (EDU 6600) and in "Engaging Communities" (EDAD 6589) I realized the huge impact that partnering with involved parties can have on a school building.  Prior to my teacher leadership program work I felt as though I was very narrowed in on things that I felt directly related to my students and I: my student's families engagement with curriculum, communicating academics to parents, providing updates, etc.  It wasn't until I looked more broadly at the entire school community that I realize the more involved I am as a teacher and the more community outreach we do as a building, the more successful our students can be.   One artifact that demonstrates my learning process when engaging with communities is my Community Engagement ...

Standard 12 Reflection

Standard 12 for Seattle Pacific University's Teacher Leadership Standards states that teacher leaders "evaluate and use technology for teaching and learning".  The class EDTC 6433, Teaching with Technology, was a great learning tool to move forward in this standard.  Technology is something that has been a passion of mine since before becoming a teacher.  It seemed so natural to me to integrate technology into my classroom practices in order to get the most out of instructional times.  Where this class helped me the most, however, is thinking about leveraging technology for our entire school building, our communities, and in working with teachers who aren't as comfortable with technology.  While I think the entire "Teaching with Technology" blog page demonstrates various aspects of this standard ( linked here ), I think both reflection #3 and reflection #5 highlight key understandings from the course related to the standard.  These two subjects, digital...