Skip to main content

Survey of Instructional Strategies- Reflection


Over the course of this quarter, my confidence in using and naming instructional strategies has drastically increased.  While I already had knowledge of many of these strategies under my belt prior to taking this course and used them frequently, I was not in a position to effectively teach them to others or even collect data on them within my own teaching.  One of the most powerful pieces to my learning in this course was being able to put a name to the strategies that I’ve previously found successful within my own teaching.  With now having the increased knowledge of names of instructional strategies, areas in lessons and units that they are most effective, and an ability to take data of them, I am able to have meaningful conversations with other educators.  I also have more tools for my teacher leader “toolkit” as far as guiding teachers to effective, research based strategies that help further student learning. 

In addition to the deep dive into specific strategies, I have come away with a better understanding of an inquiry model when conducting a PD.  While I have experienced this model from a participant perspective and have even been a part PD collaborations with other educators when helping teach specific things within my building, I had never truly been on a creating end of it.  After having the inquiry model “spelled out” for me and attempting to put it into action, it gave me a better understanding of how effective conducting teacher education in this model can be. 

Finally, I have more confidence with providing positive and constructive feedback to other educators.  This course allowed me to use the information I had about coaching and actually implement it while giving feedback to peers.  Not only was it so valuable to get a peek into others’ classrooms through video lessons, but it was great practice looking for specific instructional strategies and giving data based feedback. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 1 Reflection

Standard 1 of Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders “model ethical and moral behavior”.  The class EDU 6085 was one class that focused specifically on this standard.   Below is a reflection from reading “The Charged Classroom” by Judith Pace that demonstrates my understanding related to this standard.    When considering “The Charged Classroom”, Judith Pace is primarily referring to the many challenges that both teachers and students face when encountering differences or potentially uncomfortable conversations within the classroom.  Many factors can contribute to a “charged” classroom, such as academic rigor and pressures that both teachers and students face, opportunities for discussion around conflicting viewpoints, or communicating academic standards and results.  While Pace highlights the many difficulties that can accompany a “charged” classroom, it is evident that such is unavoidable and can c...

Standard 11 Reflection

Standard 11- Formative and Summative Assessment Standard 11 in Teacher Leadership standards for Seattle Pacific University states one must be able to “ utilize formative and summative assessment in a standards based environment .” As my skills in other teacher leadership standards have increased, this one naturally did as well.  While I used to shy away from the word “assessment” all together, I have realized that I cannot be a skilled and effective teacher without it.  I also realized how much I used formative assessments throughout my lessons without explicitly planning it. Throughout my experience in the Teacher Leadership program, my skills in both implementing specific formative assessment and choosing appropriate summative assessments have increased. At the very beginning of our program, we spent some time looking through our districts evaluation criteria, mine being the Danielson Framework.  We identified areas of strength and areas we want to ...