Skip to main content

Communication & Collaboration- Initial Reflection


While each model of distributed leadership had clear differences, they all seemed to base their ideas on the premise that leadership can take place within a variety of contexts and are not limited to just one specific person or role.  This is also true of my experiences in a school setting.  I related most to Ogawa, Pounder, and colleagues' model of leadership as an organization-wide resource of power and influence.  There are various types of leadership within our building and my district, each which comes with its own set of power and influence.  While certainly administration holds a significant amount of power and often times influence as well, certain teachers in our building share and equal amount of influence, especially with other colleagues and with parents. 

I also related to this model's criteria for effective organizations, particularly being able to control relationships within an environment and building a sense of commitment amongst staff.  Without these two things, I don't know if one could consider themselves a leader in the building at all, regardless of position or authority.  I believe this is why we often see administration struggle to get teachers "on board" with various visions or missions of the building- because they haven't first instilled a sense of commitment and aren't stakeholders themselves of the relationships within the building. 

Fortunately, I currently have amazing administrators who invest in their staff and trust them to take on various leadership roles or involve staff members in completing administrative tasks to see input.  This is where I also related with Firestone's task-oriented model.  There are many tasks that need to be done throughout the school year, and while a teacher may not have a specific named leadership roles within the building, usually teachers that have more responsibility are viewed more as leaders than others.  Also when considering this model, I thought the seven ways to break up leadership tasks were unique.  Among the tasks listed, I realized that almost all of those items would fall under either our principal or assistant principal.  It would be interesting to see our building run under a similar model, and how that would shift some of our leaders within the building. 

When considering professional learning, our building often relies on experts in the field or instructional coaches/TOSA's to provide much of our professional development.  Within the past year or so, however, we have begun allowing teachers to be the experts of their own craft and open up their rooms to various professional development sessions.  I think this is where the best learning can happen as an educator.  I appreciated the reflective question about social justice, as that is intensive but extremely important work that needs to happen both as a district and within a building.  The Issaquah School District has committed years of their whole district PD to social justice issues and also has paid for experts in the field to conduct repeated work with each building.  It is important when considering aspects of social justice that there is a lot of personal work that needs to be done by leaders themselves before they can bring along staff members on their journey.  This is a great instance to use the diversity you have in your building and pull out "leaders" that haven't previously been named. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 1 Reflection

Standard 1 of Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders “model ethical and moral behavior”.  The class EDU 6085 was one class that focused specifically on this standard.   Below is a reflection from reading “The Charged Classroom” by Judith Pace that demonstrates my understanding related to this standard.    When considering “The Charged Classroom”, Judith Pace is primarily referring to the many challenges that both teachers and students face when encountering differences or potentially uncomfortable conversations within the classroom.  Many factors can contribute to a “charged” classroom, such as academic rigor and pressures that both teachers and students face, opportunities for discussion around conflicting viewpoints, or communicating academic standards and results.  While Pace highlights the many difficulties that can accompany a “charged” classroom, it is evident that such is unavoidable and can c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Standard 6 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 6 states that teacher leaders "communicate and collaborate with a variety of stakeholders".  Both within the classes "Communication and Collaboration" (EDU 6600) and in "Engaging Communities" (EDAD 6589) I realized the huge impact that partnering with involved parties can have on a school building.  Prior to my teacher leadership program work I felt as though I was very narrowed in on things that I felt directly related to my students and I: my student's families engagement with curriculum, communicating academics to parents, providing updates, etc.  It wasn't until I looked more broadly at the entire school community that I realize the more involved I am as a teacher and the more community outreach we do as a building, the more successful our students can be.   One artifact that demonstrates my learning process when engaging with communities is my Community Engagement ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Standard 12 Reflection

Standard 12 for Seattle Pacific University's Teacher Leadership Standards states that teacher leaders "evaluate and use technology for teaching and learning".  The class EDTC 6433, Teaching with Technology, was a great learning tool to move forward in this standard.  Technology is something that has been a passion of mine since before becoming a teacher.  It seemed so natural to me to integrate technology into my classroom practices in order to get the most out of instructional times.  Where this class helped me the most, however, is thinking about leveraging technology for our entire school building, our communities, and in working with teachers who aren't as comfortable with technology.  While I think the entire "Teaching with Technology" blog page demonstrates various aspects of this standard ( linked here ), I think both reflection #3 and reflection #5 highlight key understandings from the course related to the standard.  These two subjects, digital...
Post a Comment
Read more