Skip to main content

Communication & Collaboration- Initial Reflection


While each model of distributed leadership had clear differences, they all seemed to base their ideas on the premise that leadership can take place within a variety of contexts and are not limited to just one specific person or role.  This is also true of my experiences in a school setting.  I related most to Ogawa, Pounder, and colleagues' model of leadership as an organization-wide resource of power and influence.  There are various types of leadership within our building and my district, each which comes with its own set of power and influence.  While certainly administration holds a significant amount of power and often times influence as well, certain teachers in our building share and equal amount of influence, especially with other colleagues and with parents. 

I also related to this model's criteria for effective organizations, particularly being able to control relationships within an environment and building a sense of commitment amongst staff.  Without these two things, I don't know if one could consider themselves a leader in the building at all, regardless of position or authority.  I believe this is why we often see administration struggle to get teachers "on board" with various visions or missions of the building- because they haven't first instilled a sense of commitment and aren't stakeholders themselves of the relationships within the building. 

Fortunately, I currently have amazing administrators who invest in their staff and trust them to take on various leadership roles or involve staff members in completing administrative tasks to see input.  This is where I also related with Firestone's task-oriented model.  There are many tasks that need to be done throughout the school year, and while a teacher may not have a specific named leadership roles within the building, usually teachers that have more responsibility are viewed more as leaders than others.  Also when considering this model, I thought the seven ways to break up leadership tasks were unique.  Among the tasks listed, I realized that almost all of those items would fall under either our principal or assistant principal.  It would be interesting to see our building run under a similar model, and how that would shift some of our leaders within the building. 

When considering professional learning, our building often relies on experts in the field or instructional coaches/TOSA's to provide much of our professional development.  Within the past year or so, however, we have begun allowing teachers to be the experts of their own craft and open up their rooms to various professional development sessions.  I think this is where the best learning can happen as an educator.  I appreciated the reflective question about social justice, as that is intensive but extremely important work that needs to happen both as a district and within a building.  The Issaquah School District has committed years of their whole district PD to social justice issues and also has paid for experts in the field to conduct repeated work with each building.  It is important when considering aspects of social justice that there is a lot of personal work that needs to be done by leaders themselves before they can bring along staff members on their journey.  This is a great instance to use the diversity you have in your building and pull out "leaders" that haven't previously been named. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 11 Reflection

Standard 11- Formative and Summative Assessment Standard 11 in Teacher Leadership standards for Seattle Pacific University states one must be able to “ utilize formative and summative assessment in a standards based environment .” As my skills in other teacher leadership standards have increased, this one naturally did as well.  While I used to shy away from the word “assessment” all together, I have realized that I cannot be a skilled and effective teacher without it.  I also realized how much I used formative assessments throughout my lessons without explicitly planning it. Throughout my experience in the Teacher Leadership program, my skills in both implementing specific formative assessment and choosing appropriate summative assessments have increased. At the very beginning of our program, we spent some time looking through our districts evaluation criteria, mine being the Danielson Framework.  We identified areas of strength and areas we want to work on throug
Post a Comment
Read more

Reflection on Teaching and Learning

Teacher Leadership Standard 3 The third Teacher Leadership standard states " Teacher leaders improve teaching and learning through the use of educational research a the classroom and school levels" ( Seattle Pacific University-Teacher Leadership Program Standards).  While various classes within SPU's teacher leadership program facilitated opportunities to improve teaching and learning practices, completing an action research project and sharing my findings with administration was a learning experience that best highlighted this standard.  Throughout my reflection you will notice that I was able to take charge of my own learning and growth within my classroom, and then share my findings with others.  Going through the practice of identifying areas of growth, doing my own educational research, and then implementing a plan of action within my classroom was an empowering experience as an educator and helped sharpen my skills as a teacher leader in order to facilitate actio
Post a Comment
Read more

Standard 1 Reflection

Standard 1 of Seattle Pacific University's Standards for Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders “model ethical and moral behavior”.  The class EDU 6085 was one class that focused specifically on this standard.   Below is a reflection from reading “The Charged Classroom” by Judith Pace that demonstrates my understanding related to this standard.    When considering “The Charged Classroom”, Judith Pace is primarily referring to the many challenges that both teachers and students face when encountering differences or potentially uncomfortable conversations within the classroom.  Many factors can contribute to a “charged” classroom, such as academic rigor and pressures that both teachers and students face, opportunities for discussion around conflicting viewpoints, or communicating academic standards and results.  While Pace highlights the many difficulties that can accompany a “charged” classroom, it is evident that such is unavoidable and can contribute towards a healt
Post a Comment
Read more