Skip to main content

Standard 9

Standard 9

The Seattle Pacific University Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 9 states teacher leaders “evaluate and use effective curriculum design”.  Throughout my experiences both in my teaching position and through pieces of the courses I have taken in this program, I have had opportunities to practice evaluating and using effective curriculum design.  Within the course “survey of instructional strategies”, we were provided with many opportunities to practice and teach research based strategies that can then be used as guidelines within curriculum development and design.  Through my teaching position, I have also been given opportunities to sharpen my skills in this area such as designing a curriculum map for my team and being a part of a STEM curriculum adoption committee.

Prior to entering the teacher leadership program, I did feel competent in creating and evaluating effective curriculum design.  When I started my first teaching job in Washington State, I was actually shocked by the full curriculum already planned out and given to teachers in my district.  My teacher education program in Michigan focused heavily on creating our own effective, standards based curriculum, because many districts in the state did not have rich and full curriculums offered.  I think this is the best way to learn, because until you know how to design cohesive, standards based units and evaluate it using research based practices, how do you know pre-made curriculum is really effective?  
I used this as an opportunity to demonstrate something that I could bring to my team, even though I was a beginning teacher.  Many of our teachers felt overwhelmed by the amount of curriculum to get through in some areas, and then I noticed we were really lacking in current and updated curriculum in other areas.  I felt like part of the reason the team was overwhelmed was because they didn’t have a clear or cohesive curriculum map. (Linked here) you can see the curriculum map that was made for our team.  I felt it was important for us to have something we could hang up and visually see daily. It was important to me to have something where we could look at a unit and visually see how long it was going to take.  Without having a clear understanding of how much time we have in our units or what topics will be coming up next, the instruction we would deliver wouldn’t be the most effective it could be. Moving forward with this, I would like to continue my research to make our curriculum mapping more effective.  The ASCD article “curriculum mapping” states that while planning that “what” and the “when” is important, good curriculum mapping also includes the “how” (Burns, 2001). Before I take on the role of team leader next year, I plan on digging deeper into this and making a plan to both keep a simple curriculum map that can be posted and glanced at, but then also have it online and linkable to more detailed instructions.    
The “Survey of Instructional Strategies” course also helped with curriculum design because it allowed me to look for exceptional, research based strategies within curriculum already provided for us.  When you are fortunate to have an abundance of curriculum provided to you, you often have to pick and choose lessons due to time constraints. This course gave me a better understanding of what good instructional strategies looked like such as opportunities of collaborative learning, nonlinguistic representations, communication of learning targets, effective reading strategies, and research based graphic organizers (Hyginus et.al., 2018).  It also helped with knowing what strategies would be best to use with specific types of lessons. Gaining this knowledge, I was able to weed out ineffective lessons given to us in curriculum. I was also able to enhance units that didn’t have as many effective strategies embedded in them. (Here) is an example of a lesson from a science unit that was outdated and didn’t have effective strategies within the lessons. I was able to use what I learned from the instructional strategies course to change it while still teaching the same content.  
The final experience that has increased my knowledge of evaluating effective curriculum is being a member of our districts STEM adoption committee.  Here, I was able dig into state standards, pulling them apart and identifying “look fors” in curriculum. I learned even more the importance of aligning our philosophy and teaching practice beliefs with current state adopted standards.  We used this to allow alignment to be a priority in our future decision making, something that is recommended widely when discussing a new curriculum adoption (edreports) I was able to also evaluate various science curriculums to look for effective, research based pedagogy and provide feedback and suggestions on each.  I look forward to my future experiences with this committee as we move onto engaging staff members in our final selections, further evaluation by piloting resources and comparing them to best practice, and training teachers in new implementation of a curriculum.



References:
3 Resources for Successful Curriculum Adoption. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Burns, R. C. (n.d.). Curriculum Mapping. Retrieved from              p://www.ascd.org/publications/curriculum-handbook/421/chapters/Overview.aspx
Hyginus, Arun, Brittani, Imran, S., Hamood, Hamood, & Fekara. (2018, February 28). 7 Effective
Teaching Strategies For The Classroom. Retrieved from
https://www.quizalize.com/blog/2018/02/23/teaching-strategies/

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 8 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University’s Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 8 states that teacher leaders “ present professional practice for the review of colleagues .”  This standards summarized the entire experience of our teacher leadership program.  We have been given opportunities to reflect on our teaching through recording various teaching strategies and seek feedback from colleagues, practice coaching techniques, and also get feedback from various research, papers, and presentations around a specific educational topic.   At the beginning of the course, you can read about my initial reflection here .  This is where I engaged in self-reflection to identify the areas of focus I had for this program in regards to my district’s instructional framework, Danielson.  Since this course, I have had many opportunities to expand my knowledge in my self-selected area, Domain 3, along with all Danielson domains.   Survey of Instructional Strategies is the course...
Post a Comment
Read more

EDTC 6433- Module 2 Blog Post

Using Technology to Assess Student Reading Levels Using the second ISTE Standard, developing digital age learning experiences and assessments, I asked a question that hopefully I could answer to further my technology integration in reading: “ How can I use technology to monitor and assess student reading levels for my first graders?”.  Currently, I assess student reading levels using the Fountas and Pinnell benchmark system, assigning letters that match student reading levels.  Since this is required by my district and is an effective system, it is not something I am looking to change.  We only are required to test these students 2-3 times per year (depending on their level); however, so I am looking for something to fill in the gaps in between these larger testing windows.  Performing Fountas and Pinnell tests can be very time consuming, so finding an online resource to help get an idea of student reading levels between testing would be a huge time saver, and ...
2 comments
Read more

EDU 6433 Module 1 Reflection

Incorporating Technology Within Genius Hour Using the first ISTE Standard, facilitating and inspiring student learning and creativity, I asked a question that hopefully I could answer to further my technology integration: “ How can I incorporate technology to advance student innovation during Genius Hour with my first graders? ”.  I have been implementing Genius Hour in my classroom for about a year now, and am very passionate about implementing passion projects or student centered learning within a classroom from a young age.  I even wrote another unrelated blog post   about Genius Hour in a primary classroom prior to taking this course, so the concept of Genius Hour is something that I am comfortable with and am now looking to improve.  Prior to researching articles to answer this question, I did allow some use of technology during genius hour, but I felt like I was only using it as a replacement to other tools rather than a way to advance innovation.  Thi...
5 comments
Read more