Skip to main content

Standard 10

Standard 10 for Seattle Pacific University's Standards For Teacher Leadership states that teacher leaders "understand effective use of research based instructional practices."  The course "survey of instructional strategies was perfect for deepening my skills and understanding in this area.  When reflecting during this course, I often would say that while I was using many of these strategies regularly, I now had the skills to help support others with them because I had the foundation of common language and research based reasons about why they are effective.  

This course looked into various instructional strategies, many of which we demonstrated through planning or teaching lessons using these skills.  I have chosen some of the instructional strategies that were learned to demonstrate my understanding in this standard: 


The first instructional strategy that we demonstrated was involving students in the lesson's learning target and connecting it to previous and future lessons.  Here is a video of the lesson I taught along with the lesson plans.  I also have a screenshot of how I communicated my math topics to parents.  This was sent out through class dojo, a website I use to communicate with parents and have students store digital portfolios.  Here is a picture of the exit ticket I used to monitor whether students understood learning target.  Each student completed this after meeting with me in a small group.  Communicating and Engaging students in the learning target is crucial for measuring student success (Moss, Burkart, 2009).  

Another set of important instructional strategies that we worked on were cooperative learning, effective cues/questioning, and advance organizers.  Here are some sample clips from a writing lesson where I demonstrated these strategies.  Linked are also my lesson plans, and group work samples.  Much of the planning that went into these cooperative groups such as how to organize my groups and which jobs I gave my students came from Hattie's research and from his visible learning text (Hattie, 2014).

I have continued to implement these strategies in my classroom since this course, and have also had some opportunities to partner with other teachers on these.  Both sharing what I have learned and co-teaching with other teachers using these strategies also helps me strengthen my teaching practices.




References:

Hattie, J. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Place of publication not identified: Sage Publications.

Moss, C. M., & Brookart, S. M. (n.d.). Formative Feedback for Teaching. Formative Assessment: Making It Happen in the Classroom Formative Assessment: Making It Happen in the Classroom,57-78.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 8 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University’s Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 8 states that teacher leaders “ present professional practice for the review of colleagues .”  This standards summarized the entire experience of our teacher leadership program.  We have been given opportunities to reflect on our teaching through recording various teaching strategies and seek feedback from colleagues, practice coaching techniques, and also get feedback from various research, papers, and presentations around a specific educational topic.   At the beginning of the course, you can read about my initial reflection here .  This is where I engaged in self-reflection to identify the areas of focus I had for this program in regards to my district’s instructional framework, Danielson.  Since this course, I have had many opportunities to expand my knowledge in my self-selected area, Domain 3, along with all Danielson domains.   Survey of Instructional Strategies is the course...

EDTC 6433- Module 2 Blog Post

Using Technology to Assess Student Reading Levels Using the second ISTE Standard, developing digital age learning experiences and assessments, I asked a question that hopefully I could answer to further my technology integration in reading: “ How can I use technology to monitor and assess student reading levels for my first graders?”.  Currently, I assess student reading levels using the Fountas and Pinnell benchmark system, assigning letters that match student reading levels.  Since this is required by my district and is an effective system, it is not something I am looking to change.  We only are required to test these students 2-3 times per year (depending on their level); however, so I am looking for something to fill in the gaps in between these larger testing windows.  Performing Fountas and Pinnell tests can be very time consuming, so finding an online resource to help get an idea of student reading levels between testing would be a huge time saver, and ...

EDU 6433 Module 1 Reflection

Incorporating Technology Within Genius Hour Using the first ISTE Standard, facilitating and inspiring student learning and creativity, I asked a question that hopefully I could answer to further my technology integration: “ How can I incorporate technology to advance student innovation during Genius Hour with my first graders? ”.  I have been implementing Genius Hour in my classroom for about a year now, and am very passionate about implementing passion projects or student centered learning within a classroom from a young age.  I even wrote another unrelated blog post   about Genius Hour in a primary classroom prior to taking this course, so the concept of Genius Hour is something that I am comfortable with and am now looking to improve.  Prior to researching articles to answer this question, I did allow some use of technology during genius hour, but I felt like I was only using it as a replacement to other tools rather than a way to advance innovation.  Thi...