Skip to main content

Standard 4 Reflection

Standard Four in Seattle Pacific University's standards for Teacher Leadership is to "engage in analysis of teaching and collaborative practices".  While I have had the opportunity to do this throughout this program, my learning experiences in EDU 6528, Accomplished Teaching, showcase this standard well.  Linked here, you can take a look at my initial reflection at the beginning of the course.  This gives you an idea of what my goals were heading into the course and how I intended to accomplish them.  Reading back through this, I was shocked to realize how much more confident I now am in selecting appropriate teaching strategies.  While this was only last school year, the work that was done throughout this course and many others has drastically changed my teaching practices.  My final reflection of the course, linked here, highlights the direction I took in my learning.  It also shows how I connected my learning from standard 3 with research to collaborating with other teachers in standard 4. 

After this course, I went forward with my action research idea of increasing math communication using digitial portfolios.  That information can be found here.  I also continue to use coaching moves and paraphrasing in my professional life and even with my students within the classroom.  As I become our team leader next school year, reading through my learning in Accomplished Teaching, especially about communication with staff members and coaching moves, I was glad to have the reminder.  I look forward to continuing to work on this, as there are daily opportunities in the world of education.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Standard 8 Reflection

Seattle Pacific University’s Standards for Teacher Leadership Standard 8 states that teacher leaders “ present professional practice for the review of colleagues .”  This standards summarized the entire experience of our teacher leadership program.  We have been given opportunities to reflect on our teaching through recording various teaching strategies and seek feedback from colleagues, practice coaching techniques, and also get feedback from various research, papers, and presentations around a specific educational topic.   At the beginning of the course, you can read about my initial reflection here .  This is where I engaged in self-reflection to identify the areas of focus I had for this program in regards to my district’s instructional framework, Danielson.  Since this course, I have had many opportunities to expand my knowledge in my self-selected area, Domain 3, along with all Danielson domains.   Survey of Instructional Strategies is the course...

EDTC 6433- Module 2 Blog Post

Using Technology to Assess Student Reading Levels Using the second ISTE Standard, developing digital age learning experiences and assessments, I asked a question that hopefully I could answer to further my technology integration in reading: “ How can I use technology to monitor and assess student reading levels for my first graders?”.  Currently, I assess student reading levels using the Fountas and Pinnell benchmark system, assigning letters that match student reading levels.  Since this is required by my district and is an effective system, it is not something I am looking to change.  We only are required to test these students 2-3 times per year (depending on their level); however, so I am looking for something to fill in the gaps in between these larger testing windows.  Performing Fountas and Pinnell tests can be very time consuming, so finding an online resource to help get an idea of student reading levels between testing would be a huge time saver, and ...

EDU 6433 Module 1 Reflection

Incorporating Technology Within Genius Hour Using the first ISTE Standard, facilitating and inspiring student learning and creativity, I asked a question that hopefully I could answer to further my technology integration: “ How can I incorporate technology to advance student innovation during Genius Hour with my first graders? ”.  I have been implementing Genius Hour in my classroom for about a year now, and am very passionate about implementing passion projects or student centered learning within a classroom from a young age.  I even wrote another unrelated blog post   about Genius Hour in a primary classroom prior to taking this course, so the concept of Genius Hour is something that I am comfortable with and am now looking to improve.  Prior to researching articles to answer this question, I did allow some use of technology during genius hour, but I felt like I was only using it as a replacement to other tools rather than a way to advance innovation.  Thi...